In a child custody and visitation case, a court is not bound by an agreement of parents regarding child support, custody, or visitation. In Puglisi v. Puglisi, 39 Fla. L. Weekly D725 (Fla. 5th DCA April 17 2014) the Florida Court of Appeal recently stated: "It is well recognized that '[a] court is not bound by an agreement of parents regarding child support, custody, or visitation.' Trang NgoanLev. Tung Phuong Nguyen, 98 So. 3d 600, 601 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012); see also Lane v. Lane, 599 So. 2d 218, 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) ('It is undisputed, and should be indisputable, that a trial court's responsibility to the child cannot be abdicated to any parent, any expert. That heavy responsibility mandates that a court is not bound by any agreement between parents, nor by the opinions of any expert or group of experts.'). The 'best interests' of the child takes predominance over any agreement between the parents and must be independently determined by the trial court. See Feliciano v. Feliciano, 674 So. 2d937 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (confirming that trial court is not bound by agreement regarding child support, custody and visitation where it determines that is not in best interests of children); Jones v. Jones, 674 So. 2d 770, 774 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (reiterating that 'best interests of the children are to govern custody decision, regardless of any stipulation between the parties')...
Posts tagged "Child Custody and Visitation Attorney in Jupiter"
Bold labels are required.