COVID-19 Information

In light of COVID-19, Matthew Lane & Associates will be able to meet with new clients via Zoom. To discuss your options, please call the office. Thank you!
Matthew Lane & Associates, P.A.
Palm Beach Gardens, Wellington, Boca Raton, West Palm Beach (561) 328-1111

Child Custody and Visitation in West Palm Beach, Florida

A child custody and visitation issue was recently decided by the Florida Court of Appeal in a case captioned Preudhomme v. Preudhomme. In this case, the Mother challenged the trial court's timesharing determination. The Mother lived in Pensacola and the Father lived in Mobile, Alabama. During the pendency of the divorce proceeding, the parents met midway between the two cities for timesharing. The parents arranged for the child to attend preschools in both cities. The Mother asked the trial court to create a parenting plan in which she had majority timesharing and the Father was given alternating weekends and holidays and weekly rotating custody during the summer. The Father asked the trial court to continue the current timesharing schedule until the child began kindergarten. The child was scheduled to begin kindergarten approximately twenty months later. After the child started kindergarten, the Father requested that he be awarded majority timesharing when the child was in school. The Father proposed that the Mother should have timesharing during alternating holidays and weekends, and for most of the summer. The court adopted the Father's proposed parenting plan.

Regarding the child custody and visitation issue, the appellate court pointed out that custody decisions must be supported by competent, substantial evidence. The court went on to state that lower courts have significant discretion in deciding timesharing matters. Courts of Appeal should affirm trial courts' decisions concerning timesharing when there is substantial and competent evidence that supports the trial courts' decisions. However, trial courts may not engage in prospective-based analyses when they create parenting plans. Trial courts are prohibited from deciding what the best interests of children will be in the future. Custody and visitation issues must be decided based on the present best interests of children because trial courts are not equipped with "crystal balls" that permit them to predict the future. The Court of Appeal stated that when the trial court in this case ruled that it was in the child's best interest for the parents to continue rotating timesharing on a weekly basis until the child entered kindergarten, and to then grant majority timesharing to the Father, the trial court engaged in a prohibited prospective-based analysis. The appellate court reversed the trial court and sent the case back with directions to the trial court to delete that portion of the Final Judgment that was based upon future events.

To speak with a child custody and visitation attorney in West Palm Beach , Florida, contact Matthew Lane & Associates, P.A. at (561) 651-7273.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For A Response

Palm Beach Gardens Office
The Financial Center at the Gardens
3801 PGA Boulevard
Suite 600
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410

Toll Free: (800) 411-3434
Phone: (561) 328-1111
Map & Directions

Wellington Office
Wellington Reserve
1035 South State Road 7
Suite 315
Wellington, Florida 33414

Toll Free: (800) 411-3434
Phone: (561) 328-1111
Map & Directions

West Palm Beach Office
Phillips Point
777 South Flagler Drive
Suite 800
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Toll Free: (800) 411-3434
Phone: (561) 328-1111
Map & Directions

Boca Raton Office
One Boca Place
2255 Glades Road
Suite 324A
Boca Raton, Florida 33431

Toll Free: (800) 411-3434
Phone: (561) 328-1111
Map & Directions