Division Of Property And Assets In Palm Beach County, Florida

It is error to include assets in an equitable distribution scheme that have been diminished or dissipated during the dissolution proceeding, unless they were diminished as a result of misconduct during the dissolution proceeding. “‘As a general proposition, it is error to include assets in an equitable distribution scheme that have been diminished or dissipated during the dissolution proceedings.’ Roth v. Roth, 973 So. 2d 580, 584 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). ‘[A]n exception to this general proposition exists when misconduct during the dissolution proceedings results in the dissipation of a marital asset.’ Id. at 584-85. Misconduct exists when one spouse has used the marital funds for his or her own benefit and for a purpose unrelated to the marriage. Id. at 585. In order to include a dissipated asset in the distribution scheme, ‘there must be evidence of the spending spouse’s intentional dissipation or destruction of the asset[ ] and the trial court must make a specific finding that the dissipation resulted from intentional misconduct.'” Id. Tummings v. Francois Division of Marital Property and Marital Assets – Marital

Archives

FindLaw Network