Matthew Lane & Associates, P.A.
Palm Beach Gardens, West Palm Beach And Wellington, Florida Offices 561-328-1095

Child Custody and Visitation in Boynton Beach, FL

In a child custody and visitation case, a court of this state may not exercise its jurisdiction if, at the time of the commencement of the proceeding, a proceeding concern­ing the custody of the child has been commenced in a court of another state which obtained jurisdiction under requirements that are substantially in conformity with the jurisdictional requirements of the UCCJEA. In Billie v. Stier the Florida Court of Appeal recently stated: "Under the UCCJEA the Miccosukee Tribe is treated as a state in the United States. Section 61.519, Florida Statutes (2012), covers situations where there are simultaneous custody proceedings in this state and in another state. That statute provides that 'a court of this state may not exercise its jurisdiction under ss. 61.514-61.524 if, at the time of the commencement of the proceeding, a proceeding concern­ing the custody of the child had been commenced in a court of another state having jurisdiction substantially in conformity with this part.' § 61.519(1), Fla. Stat. (emphasis added). 

Additionally, § 61.505, Florida Statutes (2012), states that a custody determination pertaining to an Indian child made by a tribal court must be recognized by Florida if the determination was 'made by the tribe under factual circum­stances in substantial conformity with jurisdictional standards of [the UCCJEA].' § 61.505, Fla. Stat. (emphasis added). Under those sections, if the Tribal Court in this case had substantially complied with the requirements of the UCCJEA, it would have jurisdiction and not the court of the State of Honda.

Substantial conformity is not defined in the statutes, but several cases have construed the term. In Izmery v. Izmery, 559 So. 2d 1211 (Ha. 3d DCA 1990), this court stated that the foreign court was required to afford the party an effective opportunity to be heard. In Karam v. Karam, 6 So. 3d 87 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), this court deter­mined that a French court did not satisfy the requirement of substantial compliance because 'the UCCJEA focuses on where the children were living prior to the filing' and the French court had determined only the "usual and permanent center of interest." See also Markle v. Markle, No. 266341,2007 WL 2317372, at 4 (Mich. Ct. App. Aug. 14, 2007) (finding Michigan court was not required to give full faith and credit to Texas protective order which was not entered in compli­ance with the UCCJEA's requirements for emergency orders)."

To speak with a divorce attorney in Boynton Beach, Florida, contact Matthew Lane & Associates, P.A. at (561) 651-7273. 

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Request Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Email Us For A Response

Palm Beach Gardens Office
The Financial Center at the Gardens
3801 PGA Boulevard
Suite 600
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410

Phone: 561-328-1095
Fax: (561) 472-1568
Map & Directions

Wellington Office
Wellington Reserve
1035 South State Road 7
Suite 315
Wellington, Florida 33414

Phone: 561-328-1095
Fax: (561) 472-1568
Map & Directions

West Palm Beach Office
Phillips Point
777 South Flagler Drive
Suite 800
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Phone: 561-328-1095
Fax: (561) 472-1568
Map & Directions

Boca Raton Office
One Boca Place
2255 Glades Road
Suite 324A
Boca Raton, Florida 33431

Phone: 561-328-1095
Fax: (561) 472-1568
Map & Directions