Matthew Lane & Associates, P.A.
Palm Beach Gardens, West Palm Beach And Wellington, Florida Offices 561-328-1095

Modification of Child Custody And Visitation in Jupiter, Florida

In a modification of child custody and visitation proceeding, a parent's consent to extra visitation is not a basis for a modification. In Brown v. Brown the Florida Court of Appeal recently stated: "[T]he former wife, appeals a final judgment which modifies a previously entered judgment of dissolu­tion. Because there was no showing of a substantial and material change in circumstances, we reverse. The parties' agreement as to child custody and support, among other things, was adopted by the trial court in its final judgment of dissolution. Thereafter, the former husband moved to modify that part of the judgment pertaining to custody and child support.

The matter was heard by a magistrate who stated in his recommendation: 'The Court cannot say that the testimony and evidence presented by the Former Husband, alone, amounts to a substantial and material change in circumstances. However, when the testimony and evidence presented by the Former Husband is combined with the Former Wife's lack of objection to the Former Husband receiving additional time with the child, the Court finds that this amounts to a substantial and material change in circumstances...To the extent the magistrate's report finds that the former wife consented to modification, such a finding is not supported by competent, substantial evidence of record. The former wife did testify that she tried to be accommodating when the former husband asked for additional time, as she wanted the children to have a good relationship with their father. She did not consent to modification, however, as evidenced by her response opposing the motion to modify. The matter was sent to mediation, and no agreement could be reached. She continued to contest modification at the hearing. Further, as argued to the magistrate below, a parent's consent to extra visitation is not a basis for a modification. See Henderson v. Henderson, 537 So. 2d 125, 127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Smoak v. Smoak, 658 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Sidman v. Marino, 46 So. 3d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). Section 61.13(3), Florida Statutes, requires proof that modifi­cation of a parenting plan and time-sharing schedule is in the best interests of the child and is based upon a substantial, material, and unanticipated change in circumstances.

To speak with a divorce attorney in Jupiter, Florida, contact Matthew Lane & Associates, P.A. at (561) 651-7273.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Request Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Email Us For A Response

Palm Beach Gardens Office
The Financial Center at the Gardens
3801 PGA Boulevard
Suite 600
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410

Phone: 561-328-1095
Fax: (561) 472-1568
Map & Directions

Wellington Office
Wellington Reserve
1035 South State Road 7
Suite 315
Wellington, Florida 33414

Phone: 561-328-1095
Fax: (561) 472-1568
Map & Directions

West Palm Beach Office
Phillips Point
777 South Flagler Drive
Suite 800
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Phone: 561-328-1095
Fax: (561) 472-1568
Map & Directions

Boca Raton Office
One Boca Place
2255 Glades Road
Suite 324A
Boca Raton, Florida 33431

Phone: 561-328-1095
Fax: (561) 472-1568
Map & Directions