Matthew Lane & Associates, P.A.
Palm Beach Gardens, West Palm Beach And Wellington, Florida Offices 561-328-1095

Division of Property and Assets, West Palm Beach, Florida

In a matter involving the division of property and assets, an order adjudicating issues not presented by the pleadings, noticed to the parties, or litigated below denies fundamental due process. In Austin v. Austin, the Florida Court of Appeal recently stated: "In this dissolution of marriage proceeding, we have for review the trial court's interlocutory Order on Wife's Emergency Motion, directing the liquidation of certain of the husband's assets and the disbursement of the resulting funds to assist in paying an estimated $28,000 mortgage debt, and the escrowing of other funds. 

The husband raises two issues challenging the trial court's rulings. We have jurisdiction...In his second point, the husband argues the trial court abused its discretion by ordering the liquidation of his assets when that remedy had not been pled in the wife's Motion for Emergency Relief. On this point, we agree with the husband. The wife's motion focused solely on the anticipated attorney's fees from JTA to pay the mortgage arrearage; nothing in her motion sought alternative funds from other sources, least of all, the husband's assets, one of which may or may not be nonmarital. While we sympathize with the trial court's concern that the foreclosure of the parties' home would result in the loss of substantial equity, the dictates of procedural due process demand that a party be placed on notice and given a meaningful opportunity to be heard before being divested of his or her property. 'It is well settled that an order adjudicating issues not presented by the pleadings, noticed to the parties, or litigated below denies fundamental due process.' Norberg v. Norberg, 79 So. 3d 887, 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (quoting Neumann v. Neumann, 857 So. 2d 372 ,373 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)). AccordMondello v. Torres, 47 So. 3d 389, 397 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) ('[A]s a general rule, a violation of due process occurs when a court determines matters not noticed for hearing and not the subject of appropriate pleadings.'); Mizrahi v. Mizrahi, 867 So 2d 1211,1213 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) ('Due process protections prevent a trial court from deciding matters not noticed for hearing and not the subject of appropriate pleadings.'); Cooper v. Cooper, 406 So. 2d 1223, 1224 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (holding that a judgment based outside the pleadings cannot stand)."

To speak with a Martin County family law lawyer, contact Matthew Lane & Associates, P.A. at 772 403-5800

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Request Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Email Us For A Response

Palm Beach Gardens Office
The Financial Center at the Gardens
3801 PGA Boulevard
Suite 600
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410

Phone: 561-328-1095
Fax: (561) 472-1568
Map & Directions

Wellington Office
Wellington Reserve
1035 South State Road 7
Suite 315
Wellington, Florida 33414

Phone: 561-328-1095
Fax: (561) 472-1568
Map & Directions

West Palm Beach Office
Phillips Point
777 South Flagler Drive
Suite 800
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Phone: 561-328-1095
Fax: (561) 472-1568
Map & Directions

Boca Raton Office
One Boca Place
2255 Glades Road
Suite 324A
Boca Raton, Florida 33431

Phone: 561-328-1095
Fax: (561) 472-1568
Map & Directions